The ultimate aim of Satanism is to ascend to positions of influence, seize power by covert means and, ultimately, to implement the kinds of policies which will lead to the stratification of society.   For this to be carried out, Satanists would have to be covertly in place within the different levels of government, and also with other places of influence:  the media, universities and non-government organisations such as think-tanks would be ideal places where Satanic paradigms of stratification and natural law could be insinuated into mainstream political and social thinking.

There are two obstacles standing in our way.  As with most adversaries, they have more to teach us than our allies: both of these obstacles take the form of cabals, either loosely or more formally organised, dedicated to propagating ideas contrary to our own.

Firstly, there are various above and below ground Christian organisations, which are diametrically opposed to the stratification of society.  This is even when they practise it themselves, such as the elite and secretive Catholic organisation, Opus Dei.
While there are many ‘above ground’ Christian groups which have faith-inspired overt programmes of social inclusion which are diametrically opposed to Satanic thought, there is often more to be feared from the quasi-Christian groups which disguise social re-engineering as simple humanitarian concern.  I would classify Freemasons, Rotarians various ‘Order of Knights of…’ and a host of other ‘fraternal’ organisations in this quasi- Christian group.   As you rise up the corporate ladder, you are likely to meet ten such Freemasons, Rotarians, Shriners, Sons of the Desert, whatever, for every one member of Opus Dei you might encounter.  Consequently, these ‘soft’ ideas of social inclusiveness and undeserved equality are far more prevalent than those based on hard-nosed beliefs based on theological argument.

Secondly, and this is particularly prevalent in local government and some aspects of national government, there are loosely organised cabals of left-wing ideology. 
In some ways this is the group which is most dangerous to forming policy.  

The unspoken doctrine of the left wing cabals is this:  Society is unfair.  People become criminals/ drug addicts/ winos because society is unfair and it is not their fault.  Therefore we should i) give all our help and resources to the poor criminals/ drug addicts/ winos who are the victims of Capitalism;  ii) not comply with any policies which would discourage people from becoming the aformentioned deadbeats because that would simply cover up the basic unfairness of capitalism and make it more tenable as a system.

Regardless of the political makeup of your government, your city or your county, people with left-wing tendencies gravitate towards jobs in probation, social care and some aspects of police work because a) these are the few places left where socialism is not a discredited philosophy, and b) they can earn a paycheck while putting their ideals for a ‘better’ society into practise.

In my own experience, despite the worst fears of McCarthyism, socialists are not terribly well-organised and outside of union membership, may not even belong to a specific organisation.  This should not obscure the depth of their convictions.  Policies which are implemented to discourage drug abuse, feckless parenthood and to put the penalty back into the penal system regularly founder because of resistance from the grass roots of these social services.  Attempts to force policies into place often result  in failure, costs spiralling out of control and chaos.  Attempts to cap welfare payments in the USA are an prime example of where a sensible policy to encourage prudence among those on state aid, persistently had obstacles put in its way by those that asserted that individuals have a ‘right’ to keep having children they could not afford to feed.  Similar methods are at work in the UK trying to derail the ASBO system which requires antisocial elements to behave or go to jail.

In your own place of work, while your head of department who is a member of his local church and a Rotarian may seem to be pleasant and not at all like your mortal enemy (he may even have hired you), or if you are a probation officer with Satanic leanings, you might get on tolerably well with your left-leaning manager.  However, unless you are ‘one of them’ and share their ideologies, you are going to be forever an army of one trying to change attitudes and sooner or later it is going to limit both your career and your ability to affect that change.

So what can modern Satanists do to bring about stratification?
I recommend that we learn from those that stand in our way.  While individuality is an important part of Satanism, in this respect we cannot afford to be a diffuse collection of solitary agents, there must be at least a loosely defined organisation of ideas to give a cohesive direction.  I have named this idea of a collective approach to achieving stratification Opus Diaboli – not just an amusing pun on Opus Dei, but also a reminder that it is about action.

From our Christian adversaries, we can learn the advantages of strength in numbers and in being organised with a focused game-plan.  From our ‘comrades’ on the left, we can learn the lessons of giving lip service to our paymaster’s ideologies, while having our own agenda.

In short here is the action plan:

Focus:  Policies and social trends contrary to Satanic thought should be identified and a concerted effort to bring them down.  For those that do not belong to grottoes or mix socially with other Satanists, that will mean keeping in touch with current Satanic thinking in websites and magazines, and through special interest groups which may form as part of the Opus Diaboli project.  I envisage groups forming with special interests in housing, drugs, the justice system etc.

Action:  Ideally this would happen by a) supportive politicians denouncing them in terms acceptable to the general public b)  Professionals working within the appropriate services should likewise make representations outlining socially palatable reasons why these policies are impractical, d)  sympathetic elements working in the media will be supportive of these actions, and finally e)  Monkeywrenching:-  this we have learned from the socialists – they have more or less ‘occupied’ some professions and are able to sabotage policies which do not fit their own ideologies.  Although smaller in number we can do much in our own ways.  We can ensure that non-Satanic policies do not get the full effort required to ensure success.  We can make sure that deadlines get bumped, that costs spiral out of control and that those associated with these schemes are shown  in a poor light.

In short, both Christians and the Left have created secret and semi-secret networks which have given both influence and advantage to those who have belonged to them.
Now it is our turn to build nations within nations and cities within cities, to insinuate our ideologies into the policy process and to strangle at birth those schemes which work against us.

END